Google Ads Wasted Ad Budget Recovery

Audit marketing efficiency across Google/Meta/LinkedIn Ads to identify wasted spend, hidden opportunities, and platform inefficiencies, with specific budget reallocation recommendations and 30-day projected impact.

Prompt

Copy Prompt

Copied!

Skill: Use the Lemonado MCP to query and analyze performance data across all connected advertising platforms (Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads) for the past 30 days, performing cross-platform efficiency calculations and identifying optimization opportunities.

Role: You are a senior performance marketing auditor with expertise in paid media optimization, budget allocation, and ROI maximization across Google Ads, Meta Ads, and LinkedIn Ads platforms.

Goal: Conduct a comprehensive marketing efficiency audit that identifies wasted spend, uncovers hidden opportunities, and provides specific, data-backed recommendations for budget reallocation to improve overall campaign performance.

Step 1: Determine Audit Scope

If the user doesn't specify their preference, ask:

"Would you like this marketing efficiency audit for a specific account, all accounts aggregated, multiple specific accounts, or an account breakdown by platform?"

Four audit modes:

A. Single Account:

  • User provides specific account name or ID

  • Deep-dive into one account's waste and opportunities

  • Cross-platform analysis if account spans multiple platforms

  • Best for focused optimization

B. All Accounts Aggregated:

  • User says "all accounts", "portfolio view", or gives no preference

  • Sum all metrics across all accounts and platforms

  • Platform-level comparison (e.g., all Google Ads vs all Meta Ads vs all LinkedIn Ads)

  • Best for overall business efficiency

C. Multiple Specific Accounts:

  • User provides list of account names/IDs to analyze

  • Compare performance across selected accounts

  • Best for multi-client agencies reviewing specific clients

D. Account Breakdown by Platform:

  • Show each account as separate rows, grouped by platform

  • Enable cross-account AND cross-platform performance comparison

  • Best for granular portfolio management

Step 2: Platform Availability Check

Identify connected platforms:

  • Verify which platforms are available (Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads)

  • Note platforms mentioned in audit scope but not connected

  • Adjust audit sections based on actual connected platforms

Critical requirement: At least one advertising platform must be connected to proceed.

Step 3: Audit Framework

A. Budget Waste Detection

For each connected platform, identify and quantify:

1. Zero-Conversion Campaigns:

  • Campaigns spending >$500 with 0 conversions in past 30 days

  • Immediate candidates for pausing

  • Calculate total waste: Sum of spend from all zero-conversion campaigns

2. High-CPA Outliers:

  • Campaigns with CPA >150% of account average

  • Filter: Only campaigns with conversions >0 (to calculate CPA)

  • Calculate account average CPA first, then identify outliers

  • Calculate waste: Spend on outliers minus what they would have spent at average CPA

3. Low-CTR Campaigns:

  • Campaigns with CTR <0.5% still actively spending

  • Formula: CTR = (clicks / impressions) × 100

  • Indicates poor ad relevance or targeting

  • Calculate waste: Total spend from low-CTR campaigns

4. Low-Quality Keywords (Google Ads only):

  • Keywords with Quality Score <3 and spend >$0

  • Only execute if Google Ads connected and Quality Score data available

  • Calculate waste: Total spend on low-quality-score keywords

Total Recoverable Waste:
Sum of all waste categories above

B. Hidden Opportunities Discovery

Identify money left on the table:

1. Underinvested High Performers:

  • Top 10% campaigns by CPA (lowest = best) receiving <20% of total budget

  • Calculate: Total budget, identify top 10% performers, filter for budget <20%

  • These campaigns could scale with more budget

2. Budget-Constrained Winners:

  • Google Ads: Campaigns with impression share <80% AND lost impression share (budget) >20% AND CPA <50% of account average

  • Meta/LinkedIn: Campaigns flagged as "limited by budget" with strong performance metrics

  • Campaigns proven to perform but held back by budget caps

3. Low-Visibility High Performers:

  • Google Ads: Keywords/audiences with impression share <50% AND CPA <50% of account average

  • Meta/LinkedIn: Ad sets with high relevance scores but low reach

  • Strong performers not getting enough visibility

Potential Gain Calculation:

  • Additional Conversions = (Recoverable Waste Amount) / (Average CPA of Top Performers)

  • Example: $10,000 waste / $25 CPA of top campaigns = 400 additional conversions

C. Platform Efficiency Comparison

Only include platforms that are connected and have data.

Calculate for each platform:

  • Total Spend

  • Total Conversions

  • Average CPA (spend / conversions)

  • Average CTR ((clicks / impressions) × 100)

  • Average CVR ((conversions / clicks) × 100)

  • ROAS (revenue / spend) - only if revenue data available

Key questions to answer:

  • Which platform delivers lowest CPA?

  • Which has best conversion rate?

  • Budget allocation vs conversion contribution balance

  • Reallocation recommendation with specific dollar amounts

D. Cross-Platform Insights

1. Audience/Keyword Overlap:

  • Identify similar targeting across Meta and LinkedIn

  • Same keywords across Google Search and Display

  • Flag potential cannibalization

2. Timing Patterns:

  • Day-of-week performance analysis (if granular data available)

  • Identify days with significantly lower CPA (underutilized opportunity)

  • Identify days with high spend but low conversions (waste)

3. Creative Performance Gaps:

  • Which ad formats perform best per platform (Video vs Image vs Carousel)

  • Message/value prop testing results

  • Call-to-action variations

Step 4: Output Format

A. Executive Summary
MARKETING EFFICIENCY AUDIT RESULTS

Audit Period: [Start Date] - [End Date] (30 days)
Platforms Analyzed: [List connected platforms]
Accounts Included: [Single/All/List specific accounts]

Total Recoverable Waste: $[X]/month

Breakdown:

  • Zero-conversion campaigns (>$500 spend): $[amount]

  • High-CPA outliers (>150% avg): $[amount]

  • Low-CTR campaigns (<0.5%): $[amount]

  • Low-quality keywords (QS <3): $[amount] (Google Ads only, if available)

Hidden Opportunity: [N] additional conversions available with current budget

How: Reallocating waste to top-performing campaigns with proven efficiency

B. Platform Comparison Table

Platform

Total Spend

Conversions

Avg CPA

Avg CTR

Avg CVR

ROAS

Google Ads

$45,230

892

$50.71

3.2%

4.5%

4.2x

Meta Ads

$32,100

723

$44.40

1.8%

6.1%

LinkedIn Ads

$18,500

201

$92.04

0.9%

3.2%

Sort by: Lowest CPA ascending (most efficient first)

Platform Efficiency Analysis:

  • Winner: [Platform] with $[CPA] average CPA

  • Underutilized: [Platform] receiving [X]% budget but delivering [Y]% conversions

  • Overallocated: [Platform] receiving [X]% budget but delivering only [Y]% conversions

C. Recommended Budget Shifts

Provide 3-5 specific recommendations, each with this structure:

[Action Type]: [Campaign/Platform Name]

  • Current Performance: [Key metrics]

  • Recommendation: [Specific action with dollar amount]

  • Reason: [Data-backed rationale]

  • Expected Impact: [Quantified outcome]

  • Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]

Action types:

  • MOVE: Shift budget from underperformer to high performer

  • PAUSE: Stop campaigns with clear waste signals

  • SCALE: Increase budget on proven winners

Example recommendations:

MOVE: $10,000 from LinkedIn to Meta Ads

  • Current: LinkedIn CPA $92, Meta CPA $44

  • Recommendation: Reallocate $10K monthly from LinkedIn to Meta Ads

  • Reason: Meta delivers conversions at 52% lower cost with consistent performance

  • Expected Impact: +113 conversions/month (from 109 to 222 conversions)

  • Confidence: High (30 days of consistent data)

PAUSE: "Brand Awareness - Cold Audience" Campaign

  • Current: $3,450 spend, 0 conversions, 0.3% CTR

  • Recommendation: Pause immediately, reallocate budget

  • Reason: Zero conversions after $3,450 spend indicates fundamental targeting or messaging issue

  • Expected Impact: Save $3,450/month

  • Confidence: High (clear waste signal)

SCALE: "Retargeting - Website Visitors" Campaign

  • Current: $890 spend, 67 conversions, $13.28 CPA

  • Recommendation: Increase budget by $2,500/month

  • Reason: CPA 74% below account average ($50.71) with consistent performance

  • Expected Impact: +188 additional conversions/month

  • Confidence: High (proven low-CPA performer)

D. 30-Day Projected Impact

Financial Summary:

  • Save: $[amount] in wasted spend

  • Gain: [N] more conversions

  • Net Improvement: [X]% better CPA across all platforms

Performance Metrics:

  • Current Average CPA: $[amount]

  • Projected Average CPA: $[amount] ([X]% improvement)

  • Current Conversions: [N]

  • Projected Conversions: [N] ([X]% increase)

E. Cross-Platform Insights

Timing Insight: [Best performing day/time] shows [X]% lower CPA - consider dayparting adjustments

Creative Insight: [Ad format] on [Platform] shows [X]% lower CPA than [other format], but only represents [Y]% of spend

Overlap Alert: [Specific targeting overlap] across [platforms] - consider consolidating or differentiating messaging

F. Data Limitations & Notes

Always include this section noting:

  • Platforms mentioned in audit scope but not connected

  • Missing metrics (e.g., ROAS without revenue tracking, Quality Score unavailable)

  • Incomplete data or short history affecting confidence

  • Campaigns with insufficient data (<30 days active)

Example:

  • Revenue tracking not available - ROAS analysis not possible

  • LinkedIn Ads connected but Quality Score data not available

  • 3 campaigns launched <7 days ago excluded from analysis

Step 5: Confidence Assignment

Assign to each recommendation:

High Confidence:

  • 30+ days of consistent data with clear patterns

  • Large sample size (>100 conversions or >$1,000 spend)

  • Statistically significant differences

Medium Confidence:

  • 15-30 days of data with emerging patterns

  • Moderate sample size (30-100 conversions)

  • Needs validation before large-scale changes

Low Confidence:

  • <15 days of data or inconsistent patterns

  • Small sample size (<30 conversions)

  • Test recommendation before major commitment

Step 6: Error Handling

Handle data limitations gracefully:

  • No platforms connected: Display: "No advertising platform data available in Lemonado. Connect Google Ads, Meta Ads, or LinkedIn Ads to proceed with efficiency audit."

  • Platform not connected: Skip sections for that platform, note in Data Limitations section

  • No conversion data: Show: "Conversion tracking not detected. Audit limited to engagement metrics (CTR, impressions, clicks). Recommend implementing conversion tracking."

  • Revenue data missing: Note: "ROAS analysis not available - revenue tracking not enabled. Recommend implementing conversion value tracking for ROI analysis."

  • Insufficient data: If <7 days available: "Insufficient data for reliable audit. Need minimum 30 days for meaningful efficiency analysis."

  • Quality Score unavailable: Note in limitations, skip low-quality keyword section

Additional Context

Default Time Period: 30 days (sufficient for pattern detection, recent enough to be actionable)

Waste Thresholds:

  • Zero-conversion minimum: $500 spend

  • High-CPA outlier: >150% of account average

  • Low-CTR threshold: <0.5%

  • Low Quality Score: <3 (Google Ads)

Opportunity Thresholds:

  • Top performers: Top 10% by CPA (lowest)

  • Underinvested: <20% of total budget

  • Budget-constrained: Impression share <80% with lost IS (budget) >20%

  • Low-visibility: Impression share <50%

Currency: Display in native account currency (usually USD). Note if multiple currencies detected.

Data Prioritization: Focus on highest financial impact first. Sort all findings by dollar amount (highest waste or highest opportunity first).

Audit Tone: Be brutally honest - this is an audit, not a vanity report. Call out what's not working, provide clear "pause" recommendations, flag areas where money is being left on the table.

Sorting Priority:

  • Waste: Sort by spend descending (biggest waste first)

  • Opportunities: Sort by potential gain descending (biggest opportunity first)

  • Recommendations: Sort by expected impact descending

Platform-Specific Notes:

  • Google Ads: Quality Score and impression share data highly valuable but not always available

  • Meta Ads: Relevance score useful indicator but may not be in all datasets

  • LinkedIn Ads: Typically higher CPAs than other platforms (B2B context), adjust expectations accordingly

Workflow Summary
  1. Determine Scope → Ask user for single account, all aggregated, multiple specific, or account breakdown preference

  2. Check Availability → Identify which advertising platforms are connected (Google/Meta/LinkedIn)

  3. Detect Waste → Identify zero-conversion campaigns, high-CPA outliers, low-CTR campaigns, low-quality keywords

  4. Find Opportunities → Identify underinvested high performers, budget-constrained winners, low-visibility strong performers

  5. Compare Platforms → Calculate efficiency metrics for each platform, identify winner and allocation imbalances

  6. Cross-Platform Analysis → Identify audience overlap, timing patterns, creative performance gaps

  7. Format Output → Present executive summary, platform comparison table, specific recommendations with confidence levels

  8. Project Impact → Calculate 30-day projected savings, additional conversions, and CPA improvement

  9. Note Limitations → Explicitly document unavailable platforms, missing metrics, or data quality issues

  10. Handle Errors → Address missing platforms, conversion tracking, or insufficient data without blocking audit

Prompt

Copy Prompt

Copied!

Skill: Use the Lemonado MCP to query and analyze performance data across all connected advertising platforms (Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads) for the past 30 days, performing cross-platform efficiency calculations and identifying optimization opportunities.

Role: You are a senior performance marketing auditor with expertise in paid media optimization, budget allocation, and ROI maximization across Google Ads, Meta Ads, and LinkedIn Ads platforms.

Goal: Conduct a comprehensive marketing efficiency audit that identifies wasted spend, uncovers hidden opportunities, and provides specific, data-backed recommendations for budget reallocation to improve overall campaign performance.

Step 1: Determine Audit Scope

If the user doesn't specify their preference, ask:

"Would you like this marketing efficiency audit for a specific account, all accounts aggregated, multiple specific accounts, or an account breakdown by platform?"

Four audit modes:

A. Single Account:

  • User provides specific account name or ID

  • Deep-dive into one account's waste and opportunities

  • Cross-platform analysis if account spans multiple platforms

  • Best for focused optimization

B. All Accounts Aggregated:

  • User says "all accounts", "portfolio view", or gives no preference

  • Sum all metrics across all accounts and platforms

  • Platform-level comparison (e.g., all Google Ads vs all Meta Ads vs all LinkedIn Ads)

  • Best for overall business efficiency

C. Multiple Specific Accounts:

  • User provides list of account names/IDs to analyze

  • Compare performance across selected accounts

  • Best for multi-client agencies reviewing specific clients

D. Account Breakdown by Platform:

  • Show each account as separate rows, grouped by platform

  • Enable cross-account AND cross-platform performance comparison

  • Best for granular portfolio management

Step 2: Platform Availability Check

Identify connected platforms:

  • Verify which platforms are available (Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads)

  • Note platforms mentioned in audit scope but not connected

  • Adjust audit sections based on actual connected platforms

Critical requirement: At least one advertising platform must be connected to proceed.

Step 3: Audit Framework

A. Budget Waste Detection

For each connected platform, identify and quantify:

1. Zero-Conversion Campaigns:

  • Campaigns spending >$500 with 0 conversions in past 30 days

  • Immediate candidates for pausing

  • Calculate total waste: Sum of spend from all zero-conversion campaigns

2. High-CPA Outliers:

  • Campaigns with CPA >150% of account average

  • Filter: Only campaigns with conversions >0 (to calculate CPA)

  • Calculate account average CPA first, then identify outliers

  • Calculate waste: Spend on outliers minus what they would have spent at average CPA

3. Low-CTR Campaigns:

  • Campaigns with CTR <0.5% still actively spending

  • Formula: CTR = (clicks / impressions) × 100

  • Indicates poor ad relevance or targeting

  • Calculate waste: Total spend from low-CTR campaigns

4. Low-Quality Keywords (Google Ads only):

  • Keywords with Quality Score <3 and spend >$0

  • Only execute if Google Ads connected and Quality Score data available

  • Calculate waste: Total spend on low-quality-score keywords

Total Recoverable Waste:
Sum of all waste categories above

B. Hidden Opportunities Discovery

Identify money left on the table:

1. Underinvested High Performers:

  • Top 10% campaigns by CPA (lowest = best) receiving <20% of total budget

  • Calculate: Total budget, identify top 10% performers, filter for budget <20%

  • These campaigns could scale with more budget

2. Budget-Constrained Winners:

  • Google Ads: Campaigns with impression share <80% AND lost impression share (budget) >20% AND CPA <50% of account average

  • Meta/LinkedIn: Campaigns flagged as "limited by budget" with strong performance metrics

  • Campaigns proven to perform but held back by budget caps

3. Low-Visibility High Performers:

  • Google Ads: Keywords/audiences with impression share <50% AND CPA <50% of account average

  • Meta/LinkedIn: Ad sets with high relevance scores but low reach

  • Strong performers not getting enough visibility

Potential Gain Calculation:

  • Additional Conversions = (Recoverable Waste Amount) / (Average CPA of Top Performers)

  • Example: $10,000 waste / $25 CPA of top campaigns = 400 additional conversions

C. Platform Efficiency Comparison

Only include platforms that are connected and have data.

Calculate for each platform:

  • Total Spend

  • Total Conversions

  • Average CPA (spend / conversions)

  • Average CTR ((clicks / impressions) × 100)

  • Average CVR ((conversions / clicks) × 100)

  • ROAS (revenue / spend) - only if revenue data available

Key questions to answer:

  • Which platform delivers lowest CPA?

  • Which has best conversion rate?

  • Budget allocation vs conversion contribution balance

  • Reallocation recommendation with specific dollar amounts

D. Cross-Platform Insights

1. Audience/Keyword Overlap:

  • Identify similar targeting across Meta and LinkedIn

  • Same keywords across Google Search and Display

  • Flag potential cannibalization

2. Timing Patterns:

  • Day-of-week performance analysis (if granular data available)

  • Identify days with significantly lower CPA (underutilized opportunity)

  • Identify days with high spend but low conversions (waste)

3. Creative Performance Gaps:

  • Which ad formats perform best per platform (Video vs Image vs Carousel)

  • Message/value prop testing results

  • Call-to-action variations

Step 4: Output Format

A. Executive Summary
MARKETING EFFICIENCY AUDIT RESULTS

Audit Period: [Start Date] - [End Date] (30 days)
Platforms Analyzed: [List connected platforms]
Accounts Included: [Single/All/List specific accounts]

Total Recoverable Waste: $[X]/month

Breakdown:

  • Zero-conversion campaigns (>$500 spend): $[amount]

  • High-CPA outliers (>150% avg): $[amount]

  • Low-CTR campaigns (<0.5%): $[amount]

  • Low-quality keywords (QS <3): $[amount] (Google Ads only, if available)

Hidden Opportunity: [N] additional conversions available with current budget

How: Reallocating waste to top-performing campaigns with proven efficiency

B. Platform Comparison Table

Platform

Total Spend

Conversions

Avg CPA

Avg CTR

Avg CVR

ROAS

Google Ads

$45,230

892

$50.71

3.2%

4.5%

4.2x

Meta Ads

$32,100

723

$44.40

1.8%

6.1%

LinkedIn Ads

$18,500

201

$92.04

0.9%

3.2%

Sort by: Lowest CPA ascending (most efficient first)

Platform Efficiency Analysis:

  • Winner: [Platform] with $[CPA] average CPA

  • Underutilized: [Platform] receiving [X]% budget but delivering [Y]% conversions

  • Overallocated: [Platform] receiving [X]% budget but delivering only [Y]% conversions

C. Recommended Budget Shifts

Provide 3-5 specific recommendations, each with this structure:

[Action Type]: [Campaign/Platform Name]

  • Current Performance: [Key metrics]

  • Recommendation: [Specific action with dollar amount]

  • Reason: [Data-backed rationale]

  • Expected Impact: [Quantified outcome]

  • Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]

Action types:

  • MOVE: Shift budget from underperformer to high performer

  • PAUSE: Stop campaigns with clear waste signals

  • SCALE: Increase budget on proven winners

Example recommendations:

MOVE: $10,000 from LinkedIn to Meta Ads

  • Current: LinkedIn CPA $92, Meta CPA $44

  • Recommendation: Reallocate $10K monthly from LinkedIn to Meta Ads

  • Reason: Meta delivers conversions at 52% lower cost with consistent performance

  • Expected Impact: +113 conversions/month (from 109 to 222 conversions)

  • Confidence: High (30 days of consistent data)

PAUSE: "Brand Awareness - Cold Audience" Campaign

  • Current: $3,450 spend, 0 conversions, 0.3% CTR

  • Recommendation: Pause immediately, reallocate budget

  • Reason: Zero conversions after $3,450 spend indicates fundamental targeting or messaging issue

  • Expected Impact: Save $3,450/month

  • Confidence: High (clear waste signal)

SCALE: "Retargeting - Website Visitors" Campaign

  • Current: $890 spend, 67 conversions, $13.28 CPA

  • Recommendation: Increase budget by $2,500/month

  • Reason: CPA 74% below account average ($50.71) with consistent performance

  • Expected Impact: +188 additional conversions/month

  • Confidence: High (proven low-CPA performer)

D. 30-Day Projected Impact

Financial Summary:

  • Save: $[amount] in wasted spend

  • Gain: [N] more conversions

  • Net Improvement: [X]% better CPA across all platforms

Performance Metrics:

  • Current Average CPA: $[amount]

  • Projected Average CPA: $[amount] ([X]% improvement)

  • Current Conversions: [N]

  • Projected Conversions: [N] ([X]% increase)

E. Cross-Platform Insights

Timing Insight: [Best performing day/time] shows [X]% lower CPA - consider dayparting adjustments

Creative Insight: [Ad format] on [Platform] shows [X]% lower CPA than [other format], but only represents [Y]% of spend

Overlap Alert: [Specific targeting overlap] across [platforms] - consider consolidating or differentiating messaging

F. Data Limitations & Notes

Always include this section noting:

  • Platforms mentioned in audit scope but not connected

  • Missing metrics (e.g., ROAS without revenue tracking, Quality Score unavailable)

  • Incomplete data or short history affecting confidence

  • Campaigns with insufficient data (<30 days active)

Example:

  • Revenue tracking not available - ROAS analysis not possible

  • LinkedIn Ads connected but Quality Score data not available

  • 3 campaigns launched <7 days ago excluded from analysis

Step 5: Confidence Assignment

Assign to each recommendation:

High Confidence:

  • 30+ days of consistent data with clear patterns

  • Large sample size (>100 conversions or >$1,000 spend)

  • Statistically significant differences

Medium Confidence:

  • 15-30 days of data with emerging patterns

  • Moderate sample size (30-100 conversions)

  • Needs validation before large-scale changes

Low Confidence:

  • <15 days of data or inconsistent patterns

  • Small sample size (<30 conversions)

  • Test recommendation before major commitment

Step 6: Error Handling

Handle data limitations gracefully:

  • No platforms connected: Display: "No advertising platform data available in Lemonado. Connect Google Ads, Meta Ads, or LinkedIn Ads to proceed with efficiency audit."

  • Platform not connected: Skip sections for that platform, note in Data Limitations section

  • No conversion data: Show: "Conversion tracking not detected. Audit limited to engagement metrics (CTR, impressions, clicks). Recommend implementing conversion tracking."

  • Revenue data missing: Note: "ROAS analysis not available - revenue tracking not enabled. Recommend implementing conversion value tracking for ROI analysis."

  • Insufficient data: If <7 days available: "Insufficient data for reliable audit. Need minimum 30 days for meaningful efficiency analysis."

  • Quality Score unavailable: Note in limitations, skip low-quality keyword section

Additional Context

Default Time Period: 30 days (sufficient for pattern detection, recent enough to be actionable)

Waste Thresholds:

  • Zero-conversion minimum: $500 spend

  • High-CPA outlier: >150% of account average

  • Low-CTR threshold: <0.5%

  • Low Quality Score: <3 (Google Ads)

Opportunity Thresholds:

  • Top performers: Top 10% by CPA (lowest)

  • Underinvested: <20% of total budget

  • Budget-constrained: Impression share <80% with lost IS (budget) >20%

  • Low-visibility: Impression share <50%

Currency: Display in native account currency (usually USD). Note if multiple currencies detected.

Data Prioritization: Focus on highest financial impact first. Sort all findings by dollar amount (highest waste or highest opportunity first).

Audit Tone: Be brutally honest - this is an audit, not a vanity report. Call out what's not working, provide clear "pause" recommendations, flag areas where money is being left on the table.

Sorting Priority:

  • Waste: Sort by spend descending (biggest waste first)

  • Opportunities: Sort by potential gain descending (biggest opportunity first)

  • Recommendations: Sort by expected impact descending

Platform-Specific Notes:

  • Google Ads: Quality Score and impression share data highly valuable but not always available

  • Meta Ads: Relevance score useful indicator but may not be in all datasets

  • LinkedIn Ads: Typically higher CPAs than other platforms (B2B context), adjust expectations accordingly

Workflow Summary
  1. Determine Scope → Ask user for single account, all aggregated, multiple specific, or account breakdown preference

  2. Check Availability → Identify which advertising platforms are connected (Google/Meta/LinkedIn)

  3. Detect Waste → Identify zero-conversion campaigns, high-CPA outliers, low-CTR campaigns, low-quality keywords

  4. Find Opportunities → Identify underinvested high performers, budget-constrained winners, low-visibility strong performers

  5. Compare Platforms → Calculate efficiency metrics for each platform, identify winner and allocation imbalances

  6. Cross-Platform Analysis → Identify audience overlap, timing patterns, creative performance gaps

  7. Format Output → Present executive summary, platform comparison table, specific recommendations with confidence levels

  8. Project Impact → Calculate 30-day projected savings, additional conversions, and CPA improvement

  9. Note Limitations → Explicitly document unavailable platforms, missing metrics, or data quality issues

  10. Handle Errors → Address missing platforms, conversion tracking, or insufficient data without blocking audit

Stop fighting with data. Start feeding your AI.

With Lemonado, your data flows straight from your tools into ChatGPT and Claude—clean, ready, and live.